Part 2 of any progress on kmail in debian buster?
John White
john at lawquest.com
Thu Oct 3 18:10:49 BST 2019
Paul,
Though kmail2 is massively better than it was, I am still having some (very few)
kmail2 problems, Sp i am planning on making the switch to pgsql this coming
weekend, following your suggestions in earlier emails. I have kmails back to at least
2000. Do you have some idea of how much of that old stuff is going to be affected
if I make the switch from mysql to pgsql?
John
>
> On Monday, September 30, 2019 7:40:06 AM PDT Paul Vixie wrote:
> test wrote on 2019-09-30 06:16:
> >On Friday, September 27, 2019 12:16:03 PM CEST Paul Vixie wrote:
> > i am following the advice given in the attached, and i lose no e-mail.
>
> > Seriously? This advice tells you that kmail is totally broken and
> > shouldn't be used at all.
> >
> with mysql that is so.
> >
> > Is kmail still that bad after 20 years or so? If so, I won't use kmail
> > anymore --- after just starting to use it.
>
> with pgsql all is well.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdepim-users/attachments/20191003/05dbbf1c/attachment.html>
More information about the kdepim-users
mailing list