[kdepim-users] spamassassin -L (dev question)

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Friday 04 April 2008, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> no this is not to the wrong list. except maybe I should have sent it
> to the pims dev list.
>
> Why is spamassassin called with the -L option. I have spam that keeps
> getting through, and the spamassassin people basically suggest I
> shouldn't be using the -L option so RBL's can be used

Spamassassin is already slow enough. Additionally checking RBL's will 
make it even slower especially over a slow connection. Maybe the 
anti-spam wizard could allow the user to decide whether he wants to use 
RBL's or not. OTOH one can easily change this and not using RBL's seems 
to be the safer default.


Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdepim-users/attachments/20080404/6abdf7f8/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
kdepim-users at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users