[Bug 234080] kaddressbook does not store contacts to vcf

[Tobias Koenig]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234080


Tobias Koenig <tokoe at kde.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |kdepim-bugs at kde.org,
                   |                            |vkrause at kde.org
          Component|general                     |KResource compat bridges
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME
            Product|kaddressbook                |Akonadi




--- Comment #3 from Tobias Koenig <tokoe kde org>  2010-04-12 21:16:15 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > > KDE4 simply sucks. (Yes, I know it is bad to say such things in a
> > > bugreport,
> > So why do you do it then anyway?
> 
> I've explained that
There is nothing to explain, this is a bug tracker not a user forum!

> sometimes, people just need kicking in the ass ...
Well, then you are at the wrong place, we like neither ass kicking nor impolite
people...
Do not expect any help in this case

> > Which kind of resource? 'Traditional Addressbook' or 'vCard file' resource?
> 
> I don't remember ... the one that allowed me to use single .vcf
Then you should maybe remove the resource you've added and add a 'vCard file'
resource... from you previous description it sounds like you've added the
former which is known to be buggy.

> > The former shouldn't be used anymore.
> 
> why is it present then?
For most users/distribution/kde version combination this resource works without
problems.

> > Can't reproduce this here with vanilla KDE SVN trunk, both resources work fine.
> 
> sticking your head in the sand and saying "if a bug does not show on my system
> it does not exist" does not help the case
Well, if I (the developer) can't reproduce it, I have no way to fix it...

> svn says there hasn't been any possibly relevant commit to kaddressbook in the
> last FOUR months while 4.4.1 is out for one and a half month => reopening
Commits to KAddressBook are irrelevant here, the behavior is caused by the
resource, which is a completely different code base.

> > No reason to cry, Akonadi contains a cache, so you see the cached data.
> 
> no, I just see shit!
So it is brown and smells bad?

> the purpose of cache is to speed up access, not to keep completely different
> set of data
It doesn't keep completely different set of data, the data of the cache just
have not be written back to the original source (aka vCard file).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.