[Bug 234080] kaddressbook does not store contacts to vcf

kavol kavol at seznam.cz
Sun Apr 11 19:53:03 BST 2010


https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234080


kavol <kavol at seznam.cz> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|WORKSFORME                  |




--- Comment #2 from kavol <kavol seznam cz>  2010-04-11 20:53:02 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > KDE4 simply sucks. (Yes, I know it is bad to say such things in a
> > bugreport,
> So why do you do it then anyway?

I've explained that

too sad you fail to listen

> > but being nice does not help.
> Hmm? Doesn't have your mommy told you that being nice is a basic part of social
> communication?

yes, she told me

unfortunately, I'm too old by now and I have found out already that life is not
a fairytale

sometimes, people just need kicking in the ass ... and sometimes even that does
not help, like we can see here (but at least it got attention, which is more
than we can say about some other bugs rotting here for ages ...)

> > I've removed all the automagically created addressbooks and started from
> > scratch. I've added only one addressbook resource which refers to the old
> > std.vcf file.
> Which kind of resource? 'Traditional Addressbook' or 'vCard file' resource?

I don't remember ... the one that allowed me to use single .vcf

> The former shouldn't be used anymore.

why is it present then?

> > However, when I add a contact, it does not get added to the file, even if it
> > shows within the list!
> Can't reproduce this here with vanilla KDE SVN trunk, both resources work fine.

sticking your head in the sand and saying "if a bug does not show on my system
it does not exist" does not help the case

svn says there hasn't been any possibly relevant commit to kaddressbook in the
last FOUR months while 4.4.1 is out for one and a half month => reopening

... you say it's not directly in kaddressbook? - feel free to reassign

> > But after running kaddressbook again,
> > the newly added contact is there - WHERE THE HECK DOES IT COME FROM???
> No reason to cry, Akonadi contains a cache, so you see the cached data.

no, I just see shit!

the purpose of cache is to speed up access, not to keep completely different
set of data

and this doesn't explain the other question ...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.



More information about the Kdepim-bugs mailing list