[Bug 86423] Ability To Reply To HTML Email With Same HTML Format As It Was Received

Kevin Coonan kevin.coonan at gmail.com
Tue Feb 5 05:03:14 GMT 2008


------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86423         




------- Additional Comments From kevin.coonan gmail com  2008-02-05 06:03 -------
On Monday 04 February 2008 19:47:42 spinner shaw ca wrote:
> Presumably this is mainly an issue for those who correspond with Outlook users.  Does Outlook even use compliant HTML ? 


It can and does.  Wouldn't it be useful for you to actually get some FACTS rather than "..doubt it."  

> Internet Explorer doesn't conform to neither W3C standards nor javascript... does Outlook ?
> Even if Kmail was fully HTML compliant, would Outlook emails work correctly ?


Yes.

> (I doubt it, even if you ignore the embedded Office Docoument BS)
> 
> We could end up with a fully HTML compliant kmail that still won't be able to play with standards trashing MS apps.
> 

This is not a concern.  Thunderbird, Evolution, and whatever MY CUSTOMERS use does just fine with HTML.
> 
> 
> 2 CENTS: We use kmail exclusively at our company, and I don't see non-HTML an issue.


Well, in the REAL WORLD our customers use it and it is very helpful in sending messages which deal with content where the formatting helps convey meaning.  The fact that you don't understand the need, and cannot get your mind wrapped around it doesn't make it any less an issue.  Stop pretending you are in a position to judge others.

> HTML email is a security risk, therefore our IT department, with mgmt support, refuses to use it.


What???  Maybe if you are using Windows and Outlook, but is KMail so fragile that HTML will break it?  If so, let me know and I can get everyone onto Thunderbird ASAP.  If your IT department things HTML email is a security risk, perhaps they should take a quickie course on firewall and proxyserver configuration.

> We use plain text. IF we need  complex formatting, we send PDFs, via OpenOffice's 'Email via PDF' functionality.
> PDF far exceeds the "quality" of any HTML email and is easily read on every OS platform.


Yes, it does, but it is a pain to edit, in-line quote and you cannot cut-and-paste it very well (adds a CR-LF at the end of each line)

> 
> None of our suppliers or customers, small or extremely large have complained.
> In fact, some have said they now prefer PDF attachments.
> 
> This IMO is more "i don't like to think or change" on the part of other email users
> If IT decisions in more companies were actually made by IT staff, HTML email would be gone.


So would all those pesky customers as well.

Please, get a clue.  Your world is obviously very insular.  If this is the attitude of KMail then I hope someone starts another KDE native e-mail ASAP.



More information about the Kdepim-bugs mailing list