Preparing for bug-squashing day and low hanging bugs

[Jesse DuBord]

I agree with Farid. I don't think it's a bad thing if we mark "wontfix", 
"invalid", etc. on wishlist requests -- even with a brief explanation if 
you feel led (e.g. "We're not deciding to take this route right now, but 
thanks for your feedback.", something like that). For someone like me, 
if an idea is "up in the air", and I believe in it, I'll continue to 
encourage it; but if there's an answer letting me know this will be 
accepted/committed or rejected/wontfix, then at least I know where you 
direct my energies, you know? Just an encouragement.


On 10/23/2016 05:00 AM, kdenlive-request at kde.org wrote:
> Preparing for bug-squashing day and low hanging bugs
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:38:00 -0200
> From: farid abdelnour<snd.noise at gmail.com>
> To: kdenlive<kdenlive at kde.org>
> Subject: Preparing for bug-squashing day and low hanging bugs
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAHMxv36TrDOhERYUo9radTNCYbgb0o2yNOvyYscERiMGMYjssA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello
>
> We have 55 "wishlist" reports currently open in the tracker. I have already
> tagged some as "low-hanging" and most are uncorfimed reports. It would be
> great to have a look at these and close the wont fix/invalid ones: (this
> will bring some sanity to the tracker and help us organize better for the
> bug-squashing day.)
>
> https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=product%3Akdenlive%20severity%3Awishlist&list_id=1397036
>
> Here are some of the low hanging bugs I have tagged:
>
> https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=product%3Akdenlive%20flag%3Alow_hanging&list_id=1397059
>
> Since I might not understand the complexity of some, please fill free to
> add or remove the flags as necessary.
>
> Enjoy your weekend
> Cheers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20161023/aa3d30b9/attachment.html>