[kdenlive] New feature "force breeze icon theme"... should it be default?
Jean-Baptiste Mardelle
jb at kdenlive.org
Mon Jun 27 21:05:57 UTC 2016
On Monday, June 27, 2016 9:19:09 PM CEST, farid abdelnour wrote:
> Hi Jesse and all
>
> A bit late but I think this should be enabled by default and
> also add breeze icons as a dependency. First because the breeze
> icons are the "recommended" way Kdenlive is supposed to look
> like (If one doesn't like it he/she have the choice to change it
> in the settings.) Secondly because not all icon themes provide
> all the icons which are in Kdenlive's interface making it look
> buggy.
>
> Cheers
Hi all,
Trying to catch on... my idea was that on first run (or when the config
file is deleted), to detect if user is using a KDE Desktop, and if not,
enable the "Force Breeze" option by default. However I have not yet found a
simple reliable way to check that but should be possible.
If you still encounter issues with icons on git master (missing icons,
wrong colors, etc), please report the issues and tell me which Desktop
environment you use (Gnome, etc) and which KDE Frameworks version you have
- check for libkf5xmlgui package version.
By the way, adding a "Use dark color theme" to the Wizard seems a nice idea
(I also plan to refactor the Wizard so that it only has one friendly page
and no more annoying clicks to really start the app).
Regards
jb
>
> 2016-06-27 0:57 GMT-03:00 Jesse DuBord <jesse.dubord at gmail.com>:
> Hey all, wanted to get community feedback on this. It looks
> like JB has done it again with a fantastic fix for this bug
> (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360882). In non-KDE
> desktops, it used to be that there were icons and functions
> missing (because of no icons) in the Open and Add clip dialog
> boxes. Now that's (mostly) fixed, and everything works great
> when you have the Breeze theme and Breeze style used on non-KDE
> desktop environments.
>
> That said, I was wondering what everyone would think about
> having the force option enabled by default? The reason I'm
> proposing this is simple: it would, for the first time, truly
> unify the appearance of Kdenlive across the GNU/Linux world...
> which gives a HUGE benefit to product & brand recognition.
> People would be able to identify Kdenlive as it is
> out-of-the-box.
>
> What do you all think?
>
More information about the kdenlive
mailing list