[Kdenlive-devel] Releases

[Salvatore Brigaglia]

Very nice thank you! Let's spread the word out there on social networks etc
so people know the Kdenlive is not dead!


2014-05-14 21:10 GMT+02:00 Vincent Pinon <vincent.pinon at laposte.net>:

> That happened this afternoon: v0.9.8 is out!
> http://kdenlive.org/node/9179
> => relayed on planetkde.org, then quickly commented on phoronix...
>
> time to update "release" packages, test, and comment...
> and time for me to make a mess in master ;-)
>
> Le vendredi 9 mai 2014, 09:41:33 Dan Dennedy a écrit :
> > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Vincent PINON
> <vincent.pinon at laposte.net>wrote:
> > > Hi Kdenlive devs & fans,
> > >
> > > It's been a long time we have not released any piece of code, while
> much
> > > work has been done on various points.
> > > Our users either are either stuck with old 0.9.6 version (many little
> > > bugs fixed since then) or take the risk to track development head.
> > >
> > > As the laptop I carry everywhere has a too poor GPU to run movit (and
> > > I'm not the only one), I tagged the latest commit before Sesse's work
> > > merge as 0.9.6.1,
> > > and picked the later changes not involving GLSL in a separate branch
> > > ("next" was available, maybe it was not a very good choice :-/).
> > > I prepared a release version (CMake option) and tagged 0.9.6.2.
> > > Before preparing a tarball, getting PPA builds and blogging about it,
> > > maybe you would like to test a bit more this version (I don't edit
> > > movies intensively these times) or have precises fixs in mind?
> > > Up to you to react in the next few days ;-)
> >
> > I recommend that you do not add another field to your release numbering
> > scheme. It is fine for git tagging, but please consider releasing the
> next
> > version regardless of its contents as 0.9.8. Consider not so much the
> > meaning of the version number but how it might be used by software
> > collections for tracking upgrades. etc. Also, do you think users really
> > want to have to remember to specify 0.9.6.2 instead of 0.9.6? They might
> > even think that additional .2 does not represent a code change but
> perhaps
> > some packaging- or build-related change.
> >
> > > That being said, I think it shouldn't be hard to disable movit if it
> > > fails to start. Once done, maybe we could think of releasing "master"
> as
> > > 0.9.8(.0), a useful milestone (to track bugs) ! Or do you consider it
> is
> > > too far from stable ? We shouldn't disappoint the release-channel
> users...
> >
> > Based on my brief testing while updating and supporting the
> > build-kdenlive.sh script, it is not stable enough.
> >
> > +-DRD-+
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform
> available
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
> _______________________________________________
> Kdenlive-devel mailing list
> Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
>



-- 
-- 
Tore Brigaglia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20140514/1e5f048f/attachment.html>