[Kdenlive-devel] Kdenlive versionning

[Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo]

well, im not one of the kdenlive developers, but, IMO, 0.7.2 tag is correct
right now
i agree with Mads

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Mads Bondo Dydensborg
<mads at dydensborg.dk>wrote:

> Mandag 26 januar 2009 skrev Jean-Michel Pouré:
> > A lot of users are complaining that Kdenlive 0.5 or 0.6 is not working.
> > They don't understand that Kdenlive 0.7 is a complete rewrite. Should we
> > rename Kdenlive 0.7.2 to Kdenlive 2.0? What do you think?
>
> No, I think we should keep it at 0.7.2
>
> 2.0 would indicate, IMHO, a more mature application than kdenlive currently
> is. 0.7.2 fits very nicely with the current situation - moving quickly
> towards
> a 0.8 release. The big "1.0" still has a lot of "physicological" impact.
>
> Regards
>
> Mads
>
> --
> Mads Bondo Dydensborg   mads at dydensborg.dk   http://www.madsdydensborg.dk/
>
> There are many gods which Christians reject. I just believe in one less god
> then they do. The reasons that you might give for your atheism toward the
> Roman gods are likely the same reasons I would give for not believing in
> Jesus.
>                               - Dan Barker
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> _______________________________________________
> Kdenlive-devel mailing list
> Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20090126/81a4f96b/attachment.html>