[Kdenlive-devel] Kdenlive-devel Digest, Vol 20, Issue 9

[Kyle Hotchkiss]

On Jan 29, 2008 3:21 PM, <kdenlive-devel-request at lists.sourceforge.net>
wrote:

> Send Kdenlive-devel mailing list submissions to
>        kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        kdenlive-devel-request at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        kdenlive-devel-owner at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Kdenlive-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: next kdenlive relase (jb)
>   2. Re: Big Kdenlive update (jb)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:00:06 +0100
> From: jb <jb at kdenlive.org>
> Subject: Re: [Kdenlive-devel] next kdenlive relase
> To: For kdenlive developers <kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID: <200801282200.06640.jb at kdenlive.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="utf-8"
>
> On Thursday 24 January 2008 12:30:08 Kyle Hotchkiss wrote:
> > so... is kdenlive getting any new features/things with kde4?
>
> I think I will first try to make a 0.6 release of Kdenlive that is still
> based
> on KDE3.
>
> The next (0.7) Kdenlive version will be based on KDE4 but won't have many
> new
> features. I am currently working on it and the main concern is to improve
> the
> UI to make it nicer and include some nice ideas like dragging a clip's
> corner
> to crossfade and that kind of small details that are nice to have. But the
> KDE4 version means rewriting a lot of code, so the first release will most
> likely not have a lot of new features.
>
> Once the porting will be done, the titler could easily be improved and
> include
> options like object transparencies. Porting the MLT QImage producer to QT4
> should also allow for new effects like cropping, rotation, etc.
>
> regards
> Jean-Baptiste
>
> > Seems nice,

   > Seems like this and kino are the only really good/working video editors
for linux
   > it'd be neat if they could port a decent open source video editor to
windows
   > yea, I know, mlt might be hard to port, etc...
   > but just saying...

   > Kyle

>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:09:09 +0100
> From: jb <jb at kdenlive.org>
> Subject: Re: [Kdenlive-devel] Big Kdenlive update
> To: For kdenlive developers <kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID: <200801282209.09461.jb at kdenlive.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="utf-8"
>
> On Thursday 24 January 2008 08:59:34 Dan Dennedy wrote:
>
> > JB, the fix contains massive changes to the way profiles are integrated
> > throughout the framework and modules. The impact on kdenlive should be
> > little, but it does have trivial interface breakage--just to let you
> know.
> > I still have to update the mlt++ in my working copy, and I am still
> > testing. There are other changes coming as well with one big one that
> will
> > impact kdenlive...
>
> Currently the Kdenlive/MLT interface is a really small piece of code, so
> it
> shouldn't be too hard to update it, and Kdenlive already works with
> timecode
> instead of frames in most of its parts.
>
> > I am thinking this change to time representation might be best
> integrated
> > into the KDE4 port. However, it might be nice to get some of the recent
> > fixes into the current codebase for struggling kdenlive (esp. NTSC)
> users.
> > What do you think? I am trying to coordinate major changes and releases
> > between MLT and kdenlive.
>
> Yes, I think it would be good to release a last KDE3 based Kdenlive that
> includes as most fixes as possible. I am ok to work on it so that we could
> release a KDE3 based Kdenlive and a new MLT together.
>
> > Finally, JB, the next MLT commit required changes to inigo and therefore
> > would require changes to kdenlive_renderer.c. So, I added a command-line
> > option on inigo to make it mimic the behavior of kdenlive_renderer if
> you
> > want to stop worrying about maintaining it going forward.
>
> Excellent news. I will happily kill kdenlive_renderer in favor of inigo!
>
> I?am currently not very present on mailing lists and forums, but it's
> mainly
> because I spend my time on the KDE4 version, wich is progressing nicely,
> so I
> am very excited to hear that you are making progress on MLT!
>
> regards
> Jean-Baptiste
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kdenlive-devel mailing list
> Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
>
>
> End of Kdenlive-devel Digest, Vol 20, Issue 9
> *********************************************
>



-- 
~~ California is nice, ~~
~~ But California is a lie ~~
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20080129/3a53445f/attachment.html>