[Kdenlive-devel] XML representation for effects.

[Rolf Dubitzky]

On Monday 08 March 2004 16:29, Jason Wood wrote:
> > Why do we need the <effect> tag? It looks redundant... maybe I'm missing
> > something... why did we introduce it?
>
> I believe it is performing a similar job to a par tag - an effect is a
> "video" that s the output of one or more videos manipulated in some way.

good, then let's kick it and call it <par> as in SMIL (like in the new 
examples/ )

Cheers, Rolf

-- 
contacts: www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de/~dubitzky