[Kdenlive-devel] libxml++

Jason Wood jasonwood at blueyonder.co.uk
Tue Nov 19 19:25:47 UTC 2002


On Tuesday 19 Nov 2002 6:43 pm, Rolf Dubitzky wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 November 2002 05:27 pm, Jason Wood wrote:
> > If the API is reasonably stable, I'd much prefer to use xml++.
>
> I'm not 100% sure about that. I'll try it out as it is in the upcomming
> release. If it's working for our purposes, I'd suggest to use it. I mean,
> it was warking before, if they didn't break too much it'll still work. We
> don't have to follow every new release, we jus grab one, put in our CVS and
> use this version. It doesn't, make sense to ask people who want to try out
> kdenlive to checkout/compile/install various libraries.
>  As soon as the API is stable, and it becomes reasonable to expect users to
> install a seperate lib (or they have it by default), we can upgrade the
> cutters to the lates libxml++ version. Does that make sense?

yes, it does.

Cheers,
Jason

-- 
Jason Wood
Homepage : www.uchian.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk




More information about the Kdenlive mailing list