[Kdenlive-devel] Woohoo, I've reproduced the problem!

[Jason Wood]

On Thursday 07 Nov 2002 8:40 am, Rolf Dubitzky wrote:
> It is very common, that people provide a "./bootstrap" script and a
> "./clean" script. Ideally after "./clean" everything should look like a new
> checkout if you didn't change any code. The ./bootstrap can call clean, and
> should then do whatever is need to do to be able to ./configure. Would it
> make sense to check in a boostrap script? It would simplify for people
> without kdevelop.

I think that's a good idea.

> I can compile a fresh check out now without problems in RH7.3. However, a
> single include is missing in KMMRulerPanel for gcc 2.96. I took the freedom
> to use my developer access to commit this small change, is that ok?

Sure, that's fine.

Cheers,
Jason

-- 
Jason Wood
Homepage : www.uchian.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk