Review Request 116645: Simplify a lot the code in SocketLinearReader
Albert Vaca Cintora
albertvaka at gmail.com
Fri Mar 7 11:06:33 UTC 2014
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116645/#review52332
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Will this test ever fail?
- Albert Vaca Cintora
On March 7, 2014, 1:07 a.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116645/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated March 7, 2014, 1:07 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for kdeconnect.
>
>
> Repository: kdeconnect-kde
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Use QIODevice canReadLine and readLine instead of our own implementation.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> kded/backends/lan/socketlinereader.cpp 4cd8ef0
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116645/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Unittest pass, ping and mpris seem to be responsive and work with no problem.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Àlex Fiestas
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdeconnect/attachments/20140307/638f3e90/attachment.html>
More information about the KDEConnect
mailing list