KDE's rough edges... what are your experiences?

[Ross Boylan]

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:54:50AM +0100, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Thursday, 2013-10-31, 11:48:10, Michael wrote:
> > Am Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:34:56 +0100
> > 
> > schrieb Kevin Krammer <krammer at kde.org>:
> > > On Wednesday, 2013-10-30, 18:00:46, Michael wrote:
> > > > And on the thread itself, I did not talk about any applications, I
> > > > only speak of the UI + widgets and its issues. I know the threshold
> > > > might be fuzzy there sometimes.
> > > 
> > > Right. There are more precise ways to address different products,
> > > e.g. Plasma desktop or Plasma workspace(s), but anything than using
> > > the project/vendor name is usally already an improvement.
> > > 
> > > > So, KDE4 is officially abandoned, great! :-(
> > > 
> > > No.
> > > As explained in short and in length :)
> > 
> > From what I wanted to know, it generally is. That not
> > all-and-everything KDE-related is obsolete is quite clear.
> 
> I guess it also depends on the definition of abandoned. Usually that means 
> discarded or remaining untouched, etc.
> If we define abandoned as no new extensions that is of course a different 
> case.
> 
> Cheers,
> Kevin

My main concern with 4 is not whether features are being added but
whether bugs are being removed.  What are the prospects for that?  And
has anything been done in the KDE5 cycle to assure higher levels of
reliability?

Ross Boylan
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.