Spelling style on MLs
cannewilson at googlemail.com
Fri Nov 8 10:32:36 GMT 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 05/11/2013 14:27, Michael wrote:
> Am Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:40:40 +0000 schrieb Anne Wilson
> <cannewilson at googlemail.com>:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> On 01/11/2013 15:30, Michael wrote:
>>> What I doubt, is that all are absolutely "fine" and "happy"
>>> with his style.
>> Please stop assuming that you answer for others. Clearly you
> Huh? I never said I answer for others, I just *assume* stuff and I
> *think* others might be a tad or more annoyed, period. I am not
> the spokesman of all others here, I am just one single guy thinking
> he is (mostly) "right". And I guess you think you are right too. So
> where is the difference? That we disagree and only your point can
> be true?
The difference is simple. You "assume" you know what people think. I
know without a doubt that people are individuals, and there is no way
of generalising about them. There's no more to be said about this.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
More information about the kde