New hope for KMail
1i5t5.duncan at cox.net
Sun Apr 21 00:55:17 BST 2013
Jerry posted on Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:57:37 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 06:58:38 -0400 Renaud (Ron) Olgiati articulated:
>> Which one do you use now ?
>> 'I'm thinking of going over to Claws)
> I've been using claws-mail for several years now. Like any other MUA,
> it does have its idiosyncrasies; however, it is a solid program with
> lots of options and plugins available. My only real complaint is that it
> is not fully threaded.
Yet another vote for claws-mail. Ironically, in late 2001 or early 2002
when I first switched from MS and MSOE, kmail and (then) sylpheed-claws
were the two clients on my short-list. Back then, kmail won out, in part
because I standardized on kde. If I had chosen sylpheed-claws back then,
I'd have not had all the heart-ache and hassle of first /downgrading/ to
akonadified kmail, and then upgrading back to claws when I realized how
bad the akonadified kmail was and that it /was/ a downgrade, a bit over a
year and a half ago (for 4.7).
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
More information about the kde