KDE SC 4: The good, the bad, and the broken

[Dennis Neumeier]

Hi there,

I just went through your presentation and generally, it's a good and short 
overview. Let me just go through the main points that came to my mind:

1. The x.0 version thing is a good point - I would say that this is even the 
most important one. There were many german linux newspapers that wrote that 
there were many things not working as users would think in KDE 4.0. This shows 
clearly that here, developers should include this point in the roadmap.

2. Innovative Features: Well, I know, this was talked about many times all 
around the net, but still, I have many people around me that are still asking: 
"What is the advantage of this new plasma thing?" or "Why can't I simply put a 
link to an application to the desktop with right-click like I used to?" To 
really gain the attention of potential switchers to KDE SC 4, I would first of 
all answer these questions, although (I have to admit), I didn't find any real 
good answers to them. If there are any good answers, I propose to include 
those in such a presentation - that would help many LUGs, I suppose.

Greets,
Michael

Am Montag, 24. Mai 2010, um 14:01:50 schrieb Dotan Cohen:
> http:/dotancohen.com/images/kde/kde4-gbb.odp


-- 
This is the first age that's paid much attention to the future, which is a
little ironic since we may not have one.
		-- Arthur Clarke
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.