Why KDE4 is called KDE?

[Kevin Kempter]

> On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 22:21:11 +0000 (UTC)
> 
> Duncan <1i5t5.duncan at cox.net> wrote:
> > While I personally don't like a desktop full of icons,   I know some
> > people do.  I understand their view (well, to some extent), and thus
> > believe bringing back the folderview-desktop was a very good thing.
> >
> > Now it may be that over time most of these users will migrate to the
> > fuller-featured desktop that plasma was designed to be.
> 
> I presume by that you mean widgets. Personally I think they're an
> intrinsically bad idea that typifies what's wrong with KDE4. They look
> great in screen-shots and youtube, but it astonishes me that anyone
> wants active desktop components underneath application windows.
> 
> If you put aside silly features like widgets and 3-d affect, I don't see
> anything that makes plasma a  "fuller-featured desktop".
> ___________________________________________________
> This message is from the kde mailing list.
> Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
> Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
> More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
> 

Personally I love KDE4. It ROCKS !!! 

I could never be happy with my desktop if I had to go back to KDE3. I'm loving 
the widgets & plasma icons & such.

Just my 2cents....
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.