How to manage wishes that became unimportant

[Kevin Krammer]

On Monday 09 January 2006 13:00, Frank Reifenstahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sometimes an old wish filed to bugs.kde.org becomes unimportant to oneself
> but might be of some importance to other users. How to handle this? Should
> I set such wishes to "resolved" (though it isn't) to not needlessly waste
> developers ressources?

I'd say if you are the initial reporter and no one else has added comments 
yet, you can mark it as resolved, preferably adding a comment why you no 
longer require it.

If there are others who have added comments, you could just add the comment 
and mark it as resolved a week later if no one else objects.

If a developer has marked it as assigned, you can just leave it or add the 
above mentioned comment.

Cheers,
Kevin

-- 
Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer at gmx.at>
Qt/KDE Developer, Debian User
Moderator: www.mrunix.de (German), www.qtcentre.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20060114/419a75e2/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.