How to enable the old kicker icon-zoom effect in KDE 3.4?
James Richard Tyrer
tyrerj at acm.org
Wed Mar 23 08:41:20 GMT 2005
Jes Hall wrote:
>>I Disagree quite strongly. I found the icon Zoom feature very usable, and
>>I've never had any problems with it. I find it difficult to swallow that
>>the programmers who work on this stuff would be unable to overcome this
>>Who decides what's "usable" anyway? :-D Considering Linux is all about
>>choice wouldn't it be better to have this in the hands of the user? I like
>>it, and from what I'm hearing many others do as well.
> I would hazard to suggest that the developer who gives up his free time to
> maintain the code is most qualified to make such decisions.
Wrong! Such developers tend to have egos and it appears that making
something that is "way cool" has a higher priority than usability.
Hence the very fancy animation that can't be turned off.
> If the code is
> causing bugs to pile up and the effort to fix it is far greater than any gain
> in functionality, then it goes. Whether the effort is in fact greater is
> highly subjective, and only the person who is hacking on the code can truly
> judge. It is after all his time and his effort he's weighing in the balance.
Well the current code has bugs too. Those cute animated popup windows
don't have the correct X priority and AJS has already told me that he
won't fix the kicker X priority issues because it would be too difficult
and/or that I'm just wrong about it.
Are such issues Qt problems or C++ problems. Nobody seem to make such
complaints with procedural languages and tools?
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
More information about the kde