KDE appearance...

[David Findlay]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 26 May 2002 11:17, Brad wrote:
> Can anyone shed any light on why KDE looks so bad compared to Windoze? The
> KDE fonts are really rough and difficult to read, particularly when they
> are small. I don't know that it is just just the lack of True Type fonts
> (although this is probably a contributing factor) as I have installed a
> whole bunch of Windows TTFs and it has made little difference. Perhaps
> there is more to do after they are installed?
>
> I am trying to get Red Hat 7.3 installed at my work to replace our network
> of aging Win95 PCs, but I just _know_ that as soon as the staff see the
> terrible fonts that they will reject it out of hand.

For a start, dump Red Hat, and use Mandrake. It's much better. It does all 
the niceness features for you without having to change all the settings. The 
fonts look as good as Mac OS X on mandrake.

David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE88DyZx58m2d272NoRAuRsAKCRJ1fXco6okbk9QMexeHce7bgwgACfU/dW
UPRM0y/E6/44ZwFiebvRj5o=
=5i+a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.