Getting Qt on Windows
robert bowman
bowman at montana.com
Wed Aug 14 04:43:15 BST 2002
On Tuesday 13 August 2002 11:35, MET wrote:
> QT/KDE is great but why spend money on Qt licence when you can write and
> > distribute UI apps in cross platform Java? Anyone offering insights into
> Qt vs Java for UI development?
Most of our UI code is Motif based, and we port it to Windows using the
DataFocus NutCracker toolkit and the SCO XVision X server. It isn't a great
solution, as it adds a couple more layers. We did do one test app in Java
about three years ago; it is noticeably sluggish and sort of klunky looking.
I'd had great hopes for Java, but between politics and bloat my enthusiasm
evaporated a while back.
For new cross-platform work, wxWindows is worth a look. It isn't encumbered
with some of the restrictions of either Qt or Gnome and is pleasant to work
with. The API is very similar to Windows SDK. For Linux, it can either sit on
Motif or GTK, and I believe there is a straight X11 version in the works.
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
More information about the kde
mailing list