[kde-promo] artwork

[Anne Wilson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 20/08/2013 23:25, Eike Hein wrote:
> To sum it up, what our mascot is and how to use our mascot are
> related but separate problems. If we have a cute mascot, we should
> use it in places where cute mascots are appropriate. Most people,
> whatever serious business may fill their days, are OK with cute _in
> the right context_.
> 
> This does loop back into the mascot design process in the sense
> that you could start it with a set of requirements of where you
> want a mascot to be usable - but it'd probably be silly to put
> Konqui in a suit so we can put it on every screenshot; the entire
> concept of having a mascot is a bit light-hearted in the first
> place.

I feel as strongly as Myriam does, that cute is not applicable to more
serious applications, so I wonder whether we are taking the wrong road
here.

Is it not possible to create a "family" of konqi mascots?  The new one
could be Young Konqi.  We could have a Konqi specifically designed for
use in more business situations.  What about gaming Konqi, or sporting
Konqi?

It should be perfectly possible for all the images to be recognisable
as the same creature in different circumstances.

Anne
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlIUhxwACgkQj93fyh4cnBfDegCfVVzZ0u3gfyDwthVxkBimsBv6
km8An3PHlBbR6LznBGHtpwzPH3d4/cEI
=Iio9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----