Including FTOSX in KDE list ...

[Andreas Pour]

Hi,

AFAIK you are listed in the download section only if you have packages uploaded
to ftp.kde.org, and you have a "packager" account.  Thus, unless a special
exception to current procedures is made, the request would require giving
someone an account on master.kde.org, in which case trust would be somewhat of
an issue.

Also IMHO it would be preferable not to list FT packages for a number of
reasons, including that I do not know a single soul who uses FT Linux.

Rob Kaper wrote:
> 
> On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 06:41:57PM +0200, Martin Konold wrote:
> > >     Following Matthias advice I am sending this email to you.
> > >
> > >     ... I want that also our FTOSX belong to the list.
> > >
> > >            http://www.kde.org/info/3.1.2.php#binary
> >
> > I prefer if KDE is not affiliated in any way with FT. They are imho not a
> > trustworthy company.
> 
> I prefer if your (or anyone's) trust in a company doesn't influence the KDE Info Pages.
> 
> "At the time of this writing, pre-compiled packages are available for:"
> 
> That's the criterium, no? If trust is required, we can
> not reasonably keep Red Hat listed, I*M*HO.