How about this?

[marko faas]

On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 19:44, Daniel Naber wrote:
> On Sunday 20 October 2002 19:27, marko faas wrote:
> 
> > In my opinion, the best place for this third
> > level is on the right.
> 
> Like "clicking a link on the left will open a sub menu on the right"? I 
> don't think people will understand that easily.

It is just an idea. There is a third level, whether we like it or not,
and we have to put it somewhere. I think the menu on the left should
stay there always. 

This can be another option, but I don't like it:

About this site (level 1)
    * KDE people (level 2)
	- The People Behind KDE (level 3)
	- Individual Credits
	- Developer's Gallery
	- Sponsorship Thanks
	- How to Sponsor KDE
    * Mailinglists
    * Donate
    * Mirrors
    * Contact

1. This will be terrible because KDE people is on the bottom of a page
and you have to scroll to see that there is a third level menu
2. This will be terrible because it extents the already long list of
items in the menu

> >  Maybe a tagline is a better
> > idea. Or a konqui running from left to right and back :-)
> 
> I'd prefer a tagline, too.

So, lets fight about that one too :-))

> > 8. I have introduced titles in the links to make clear what the
> > referrals are and what's on www.kde.org. Again: maybe the graphics can
> > be improved.
> 
> I like that, it's useful for many links.
> 
> I think a "KDE in the Media" section doesn't make sense:
> 
> -Someone has to keep it up to date. Who will do that?  And I don't mean the 
> next four weeks, but the next year.

I just wrote in another mail that it might be doable with several
rss-feeds and a kind of automated search. Heck, if news.google.com can
do it automatically, we can do it too :-)

But I needed something to balance the menu's. Maybe there's another item
that fits better.

> -The articles are often full of errors, e.g. "The KDE League is preparing 
> to release...". Why should we link that? It's just plain wrong. We'd need 
> a second page that corrects all the mistakes in those stupid articles.

Actually, we have:
http://kdemyths.urbanlizard.com/

-- 
Regards,
Marko