Consolidation of kde domains to the main server? (was: Re: Structure of our websites (in CVS + on the servers))

[Neil Stevens]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday October 13, 2002 11:52, Jason Bainbridge wrote:
> It isn't just a re-organisation of CVS that is proposed that's why, if
> it was just re-organising CVS there wouldn't be any problems except for
> updating the cron jobs to grab the source from the right place.
>
> The proposal as I understand it as it is at the moment is to keep the
> existing www module and move everything under that within the different
> categories so each of the sites would be referencing the single template
> in www/templates.
>
> So Noatun for example would be in CVS under www/multimedia/noatun, using
> the templates in www/templates, accessed by
> http://kde.org/multimedia/noatun and also by http://noatun.kde.org.
>
> I still like my idea in regards to re-organising CVS and leaving the
> servers as is, especially if we take this opportunity to document it all
> so we can keep track of what's hosted where and who is responsible for
> it.

I agree that far, that everything should be using the same templates, and 
should be all in the same CVS tree.  But I don't see the point of moving 
everything off of ktown onto the Trolltech-run www server, or alternately 
moving www onto ktown.  Either way creates a single point of failure for 
group communication.

Do we all agree that it's practical for the different sites to share code 
via cvs, even while being hosted on different servers?

- -- 
Neil Stevens - neil at qualityassistant.com
"The nearest I can make it out, 'Love your Enemies' means, 'Hate your
Friends'." - Benjamin Franklin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9qmtYf7mnligQOmERAkLYAJ0Z2PZ0ndoDzArZrIeCQL1pjAyF7gCfSKoU
Hy8rxTaPAiQXPIguhcu3PoA=
=/a92
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----