discussion? where? well, not here...
mat.colton at web-xs.de
Mon Nov 25 03:21:09 UTC 2002
Am Montag, 25. November 2002 03:00 schrieb Navindra Umanee:
> Neil Stevens <neil at qualityassistant.com> wrote:
> > Are they what's important? I thought we'd all agreed that the point of
> > the top-level site was to serve as a "portal" to other KDE sites? That
> > the links were most important?
> "Portal" is nothing but a buzzword.
I disagree on a lot of points you put up. But IMHO you are 100% right here. :)
>The current webpage is great
> currently with constantly updated content, conveying up to date
> information, useful for users and doing the job of announcing the
> latest work of the developers. People actually have a reason to visit
Basically your right IMHO, except:
- Too much information
- How the information is presented
> Changing www.kde.org simply so that it conforms to the notion conveyed
> by a buzzword would be a step back, not an improvement.
I think the problem is what each individual thinks of as portal site. I'm not
trying to make a "hip site". It should be more usable than the current site.
And before anybody gets this wrong: I'm not saying the current site is evil.
More information about the kde-www