emerge, subversion: shouldn't packge be renamed to 1.5.0
Christian Ehrlicher
Ch.Ehrlicher at gmx.de
Fri Jul 25 13:19:00 CEST 2008
Bernhard Reiter schrieb:
> On Friday 25 July 2008 11:53, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
>>> Wouldn't it be nice to rename
>>> emerge/portage/dev-util/subversion/subversion-1.4.6.20080222.py
>>> to subversion-1.5.0.py so that people will see the incompatibility
>>> for their system svn right away from the name that emerge
>>> --print-installable shows?
>> Looks like we forget this after the 1.5.0 testing phase. Will fix it
>
> Thanks Christian!
>
> I also could have fixed it, but I wasn't sure about the policy,
> so I'd thought I'd better asked.
>
> So for the policy: If I notice a portage file.py name which is not named after
> its default target, should I just plainly rename it on sight? Or ask here
> or somewhere else?
>
Rename it - the script should be named like the default target.
Christian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-windows/attachments/20080725/9c79bb21/attachment.pgp
More information about the Kde-windows
mailing list