KDE/kdepimlibs

[Allen Winter]

On Saturday 08 December 2007 12:20:17 Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Saturday 08 December 2007 08:55, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> > Marc Mutz schrieb:
> > > On Friday 07 December 2007 16:15, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> > >> SVN commit 746037 by chehrlic:
> > >>
> > >> disable gpgme++ and gpgme for win32 - gpgme-qt is not public available
> > >> anywhere... :( CCMAIL: mutz at kde.org
> > >
> > > Umm - it's in gpgme SVN. And configure checks are in place to check for
> > > it - what more do you want?
> > >
> > > Please remove this nonsense again.
> >
> > There's no official hint where to get this. You did not tell us where we
> > can find it to make proper packages and I don't think that we should
> > package a svn version of gpgme++.
> >
> > --> It stays until we know how to compile this in a clean way *without*
> > using a svn version from somewhere. Maybe force them to release a new
> > version or provide a snapshot where we can rely on. But I won't use a
> > svn version from ouside svn.kde.org for something.
> <snip>
> 
> You just disabled something for everyone that otherwise disables itself when 
> _necessary_. I'm not making policies, but to me that looks like a politic 
> statement. Fine. Problem: The people you want this to read won't, anyway.
> 
> Your call.
> 
Can someone summarize the issue here?
I don't understand what all the arguing is about.

The stack looks like this, AFACIT:
  gpgme
  gpgme++ (in kdepimlibs)
  qgpgme (in kdepimlibs)
  kmail,etc (in kdepim)

Seems to me that if gpgme is available for Windows, and if gpgme++ and qgpgme are
ported to Windows, then we can build kmail,etc for Windows.

Christian told me that gpgme is available for Windows, right?
Does gpgme++ and qgpgme work for Windows?
What am I missing?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-windows/attachments/20071208/73eec156/attachment.html