Another point of view to consider re: compiler for KDE4/win32 binary packages
Kevin Kofler
kevin.kofler at chello.at
Sat Apr 14 05:14:30 CEST 2007
Hi,
Since there has been mainly feedback from M$VC users complaining about the
plan to only provide MinGW binaries and even going as far as suggesting to
only ship M$VC binaries instead, let me express another point of view which
appears to have been completely ignored on this list until now: application
developers who want to cross-compile their applications for Win32 from a
system like GNU/Linux.
When cross-compiling, I definitely need MinGW binaries of kdelibs. M$VC
binaries are useless for obvious reasons, and I don't think trying to
cross-compile all of kdelibs, which probably hasn't ever been tested, is
going to be a productive use of my time either. Instead, I was able to just
download the kdelibs 3.80.3 snapshot binaries (which appear not to be
available anymore, unfortunately) and get a cross-development environment set
up for my application very quickly. (My application uses qmake to build,
which can be coaxed into doing cross-compilations with some config file
trickery, see
http://tigcc-linux.cvs.sourceforge.net/tigcc-linux/ktigcc/mingw/ . And please
don't complain about the application not actually working properly on Win32
right now, that's expected, the port isn't anywhere near complete yet.)
So I hope I made my case in favor of MinGW binaries. Are there any planned for
Alpha 1?
Kevin Kofler
More information about the Kde-windows
mailing list