Akademy BoF's follow up

[Jeroen van Meeuwen]

On Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:45:05 AM Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> Hi all,
> 

Hi Myriam,

> (subscribing a few other people as I don't know who is on the testing
> list out of my head, sorry for the duplicate mails)
> 
> Akademy 2012 is over, and besides some unforeseeable problems it went
> very well :)
> 

Very unfortunate indeed, I hope you're recovering well!

> Currently there is a usability flag in Bugzilla that is requestable,
> but the default Cc list is empty. Where should this be send to?
> 

I suppose the Extra Mile initiative is a Quality Assurance team effort, would 
that be accurate? If so I suppose its mailing list would be the most eligible 
recipient to be in such CC-list, as it would probably also be where the bug is 
further discussed, on its merits, for being an Extra Mile bug or not.

Please also note the flag can currently only be requested by canconfirm users, 
and can be granted by all editbugs users. I would like to propose that any 
user can request the flag (?), and only users that are a member of (a new 
group) quality-assurance can grant it (+/-).

It would keep the list free for entry requests, yet clean from garbage.

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen

-- 
Systems Architect, Kolab Systems AG

e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
m: +44 74 2516 3817
w: http://www.kolabsys.com

pgp: 9342 BF08
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-testing/attachments/20120712/37164d86/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-testing/attachments/20120712/37164d86/attachment.sig>