ktp-common-internals license issue

[Diane Trout]

Hi,

> I would say if it uses a license which is non-existing/invalid, that
> should be enough to warrant a change by us, no? But, IANAL.

Should we pester kde-licensing?

Or maybe just ask d_ed, as I think he recruited the student.

> In the same thread from May this year, both Dan and David agreed
> to have their stuff relincesed to whatever, so I'd just make it all
> LGPLv2.1+, which is what we've all agreed back in time (can't
> find any references though).

I remember that. I just posted a reviewboard request relicensing all of the 
KTp/Logger stuff. to LGPL-2.1+. 

Diane