Porting to KF5

Martin Klapetek martin.klapetek at gmail.com
Tue Oct 28 09:18:09 UTC 2014


On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Aleix Pol <aleixpol at kde.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> I think we are all eager to see KTp working awesomely working on our
> Plasma 5 systems. I've started to push some of the ports in my BlueSystems
> time then I saw some of you were starting to push in that direction, so I
> decided to come up with a little kanboard so that we can make sure
> everything happens properly. [1]
>
> I recommend some of you to decide to take some of the modules to port. We
> should decide what we take for a good port, you'll see I added 2 subtasks
> to any task:
> - Builds with Qt5: that means that it can be built and somewhat used on
> the Qt5 version. I recommend to make naïve ports in the first run, so that
> things doesn't break. By naïve I mean using KDELibs4Support, then we can go
> stripping those down little by little. Maybe even as GCI tasks.
> - Qt5 in master: there we should decide when we're going to do the move
> and if we want any kind of quality standard to follow, such as dropping
> KDELibs4Support or similar. From my experience, things seem to work quite
> smoothly anyway (I've been using the ported KTp chat plasmoid since around
> May without much trouble).
>
> Also some release release under the KDE Frameworks umbrella would be very
> interesting soon, I'd like to hear from the maintainers about that.
>

Let's aim for as much kdelibs4support-free ports as possible for any
release/merge in master. It's not that hard and we don't have that much
code that would use it extensively (auth-handler and accounts-kcm's
internal libs are all fully ported already).

Cheers
-- 
Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-telepathy/attachments/20141028/46f66d90/attachment.html>


More information about the KDE-Telepathy mailing list