Review Request: Temp fix for the graph size limitation

Martin Klapetek martin.klapetek at gmail.com
Wed Nov 21 07:45:59 UTC 2012



> On Nov. 21, 2012, 7:41 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > nepomuk-storage.cpp, line 893
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107393/diff/2/?file=95615#file95615line893>
> >
> >     This is not going to work. The problem is that m_graph is a graph, which can be represented as a list.
> >     
> >     If you're splitting the graph, then you'll need to split it in a way such that both the new graphs are completely independent (no edges). Otherwise we will get errors.
> >     
> >     How about just decreasing the timeout for now. I don't think this is something we can fix over here. I'll have to fix it in the storeResources code.

Yeah, I was worried that would break the graph :/ Alright, I'll try decreasing the timer limit then.


- Martin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107393/#review22285
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 21, 2012, 6:59 a.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107393/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 21, 2012, 6:59 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Telepathy and Vishesh Handa.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> If we push too big graph into Nepomuk, it won't get stored because the generated sql is wayyyy to big for virtuoso to process. This is a quick fix/hack/workaround that splits the graph into smaller graphs (max 200 items) and stores these smaller graphs.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   nepomuk-storage.cpp 0ab6cba 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107393/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Successfully stored 400 contacts in Nepomuk (in overall graph size terms that's more than 600 items graph).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin Klapetek
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-telepathy/attachments/20121121/884abc17/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the KDE-Telepathy mailing list