Plasmoid presence setting and displaying

Lukas 1lukas1 at gmail.com
Thu May 26 17:00:32 CEST 2011


Unified setting is the best.

If someone want to hide from any specific network, he could create exception
rules in the config wizzard (like checking - do not use global status,
always use the one i typed bellow). That's it, funny mesages wont be
displayed on work account :)

On 26 May 2011 17:35, Francesco Nwokeka <francesco.nwokeka at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 26 May 2011 15:49, Francesco Nwokeka <francesco.nwokeka at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi to all.
> >        This is taken from a conversation between me and David.
> >
> > <David>
> >> > Also a lot of people seem to be expecting some sort of concept of
> "global
> >> > presence" (which modifies all your statuses at once). Empathy/Ubuntu
> only
> >> > deal with this, and not individual accounts at all. It should be in
> the
> >> > main Contact List too if it does happen. Do you have thoughts on this?
> >> > Worthy of a ML thread?
> >
> > <Me>
> >> I am of the same idea. I like managing seperatly my statuses for various
> >> accounts. The main contact lsit behaves like I do.
> >> Martin today told me that it would be a good idea.
> >>
> >> [13:45] <mck182> nwoki: are you planning a central presence setting?
> >> [13:45] <mck182> like one to rule them all?
> >> [13:46] <mck182> because then it might be good to display the presence
> icon
> >> in the systray ;)
> >>
> >> This way we could have the presence easily set on the plasmoid systray
> icon
> >> (different color baloons?) and people would know exactly what their
> status is.
> >
> > What's your idea on this?
> >
> > Francesco
> >
> >
>
> CC'd Lukas to thread
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-telepathy/attachments/20110526/fc059de6/attachment.htm 


More information about the KDE-Telepathy mailing list