[Bug 289662] Move of KTp components to kdereview
Martin Klapetek
martin.klapetek at gmail.com
Thu Dec 29 15:31:26 UTC 2011
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 14:47, George Goldberg
<grundleborg at googlemail.com>wrote:
> 2011/12/29 Martin Klapetek <martin.klapetek at gmail.com>
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> > we have some unmaintaned/outdated repos. Can we consider removing them?
>
> I don't think deleting repositories is appropriate. Marking as
> unmaintained or archiving or something is fine, but actually deleting
> huge amounts of code when you don't know whether it may prove useful
> again (even just for reference purposes) at some point in the future
> is a pretty bad idea. That aside, I have only one objection (below) to
> archiving these repositories.
>
Makes sense. In fact, since we're now moving to extragear, we can just
leave it in playground, it can stay there as long as sysadmins want. I
guess leaving RB entries then also makes sense.
>
> >
> > - telepathy-presence-dataengine
> > - telepathy-testlib
>
> why delete this? It has a lot of valuable code in it (anyone who's
> actually written any unit tests would know that :p)
>
The presence-dataengine is deprecated, unmaintained and rather broken. I
think having dataengine could be great, but it has to be rewritten and
there is currently no use of it. The testlib - I wasn't sure what it was
for and if it's up-to-date with the main lib. We'll have to write new unit
tests for the new lib (meh..), so this could be used as reference.
>
> --
> George
> _______________________________________________
> KDE-Telepathy mailing list
> KDE-Telepathy at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-telepathy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-telepathy/attachments/20111229/ac4a42ce/attachment.html>
More information about the KDE-Telepathy
mailing list