Telepathy-active ?

[Laszlo Papp]

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Ivan Čukić <ivan.cukic at kde.org> wrote:
>> Plasma active is definitely one of our targets, however there is
>> neither any plan nor people working on it at the moment. Hopefully,
>> some of our components can be reused in plasma active (plasma applets,
>> dataengines, approver, nepomuk service, etc...), so we just need to
>
> All non-ui things can be reused without problems, and UI things can be
> as well if the UI is touch friendly (no hover actions, ...)
>
> If the plasma  applets are QML for UI, C++ for backend, the changes
> needed (if the above condition is not met) are trivial.

I agree about this remark: it is mostly about the Ui (QML). Trivial or
not, someone needs to do it so as to be ready. ;-)

> @Lazlo
>
> There is no Plasma-Active for Harmattan at the moment, just for real
> Meego - it would be rather nice if you have the time to make and test
> the packages needed for it. That is, kdelibs - plasma - nepomuk...

Mmm, I had a working kdelibs (There was some automoc issue about the
Mobile profile, but that has already been fixed by David Faure) a bit
more than 1 month ago (I announced on the kde-mobile@ mailing list),
but the distribution of the packages got stuck because of the
Community Open Build Service issues. Those problem are unfortunately
still ongoing: It is not able to build such an enormous projects, like
kdelibs. Afterwards, I lost my sake about the continuation: workspace,
runtime and so forth. Any helps and ideas are welcome to distribute
packages like that.

https://build.pub.meego.com/package/live_build_log?arch=armv7el&package=kdelibs&project=home%3Arzr%3Aharmattan&repository=MeeGo_1.2_Harmattan_Maemo.org_MeeGo_1.2_Harmattan_standard
or/and
https://build.pub.meego.com/package/live_build_log?arch=armv7el&package=kdelibs&project=home%3Adjszapi&repository=MeeGo_1.2_Harmattan

Most of the telepathy packages are available for Harmattan since it is
preferred by default, and it is nice in my opinion. I packaged
telepathy-idle as the IRC connection manager which is my current
interest. In my opinion: using something like tp-active would be more
feasible on plasma active than porting konvi (considering that its
codebase is not mature enough right now to provide separate library
and Ui functionality).

I am looking forward to reading about the news regarding this and
thank you for your answers. :)

Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp