Where are we at?

[Matt Rogers]

On Friday, April 16, 2010 10:42:28 am George Goldberg wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> As you've probably noticed, Dario Freddi has joined the Telepathy/KDE
> project in a big way recently. The project has gained a lot of
> momentum over the last few weeks, and things have suddenly started
> happening a lot faster than before. As a result, I think we need to
> take stock again of who's working on what.
> 
> 1) The Contacts List App is progressing well, with a lot of the needed
> features (although it's still got plenty to be going on with in the
> realms of meta-contacts, appearance and usability). Dario is doing
> most of the work there, with a bit from me from time to time.
> Integration-daemon is in a similar shape.
> 
> 2) The Text-Chat GUI. Matt, you were hoping to make a start on that
> before. How's it going? Would you like an extra pair of hands there
> too?
> 

I've got some basic infrastructure set up. I think once I have something that 
builds, I'll commit it to subversion. I'm still doing through how this is all 
set up, since both Nepomuk and Telepathy are new to me.

> 3) History. roide, you had plans with regard to this. How's that
> going? What are your intention with it?
> 
> 4) Accounts KCM. This works OK, but I'm really not happy with it. I've
> put a huge amount of work into creating a better design for it, but
> since I have exams coming up, it's on hold. I'll be working full-time
> on Telepathy/KDE again come July though, so it'll get under way again
> then.
> 
> 5) Protocol side bindings. These don't exist. Is there any desire for
> them? ie. is there anyone on this list who is itching to write a
> Telepathy connection manager in Qt for some protocol not yet (well)
> supported by Telepathy?
> 

It would be nice to be able to leverage existing codebases in Kopete for those 
. Since I'm not really interested in maintaining anything having to do with a 
protocol anymore though, the answer is no, from my point of view.

> 6) Anything major I've forgotten here?
> 

There needs to be more than 24 hours in a day. ;)

> Cheers,
> 
> George

-- 
Matt