[Kde-scm-interest] New life in kdesdk-migration-to-git :) (was: Re: Layout of "lokalize" and "kompare" git repos with plugins integrated (was: Re: Forming repos by plugin type or code domain?))

[Sebastian Dörner]

I've been working with Jeremy (and Nicolas) so we can finally get this over
with. This is a heads-up about the strigi-analyzers. The current situation
is as follows:

1)  Nobody seems to have very strong opinions about whether to have the
analyzers with the apps or their own repo (among the stakeholders Nick,
Kevin, Friedrich, Jeremy, me)
2)  Nick prefers the analyzers separate, because the analyzers don't depend
on lokalize.
3)  Kevin is unsure, would like to be consistent with whatever Lokalize
does.
4) KDE / Nepomuk will probably move away from strigi in the future.
5) Currently distributions often have a separate package
kdesdk-strigi-analyzers (or similar).
6) It is easiest from a rule-writing pov to keep the analyzers separate.

Particularly because of points 4 and 5 we are currently implementing a
solution with separate repos for strigi-analyzers (all of them) and
thumbnailers. Neither the kompare nor the lokalize repo would then contain
any strigi-analyzers.
If you have any objections, please bring them forward now.

Regards
Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20121228/1ecdd235/attachment.html>