[Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

[Albert Astals Cid]

A Dimarts, 16 de febrer de 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen va escriure:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:01:44AM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > On Monday 15. February 2010 23.50.56 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > > The thing is that i don't see consensus *at all*.
> > > 
> > > so? by suppressing the offer you make sure that there won't be any.
> > 
> > Calm down,
> 
> i'm pretty much always calm. ;)
> 
> > Albert is not suppressing anything.
> 
> no - he doesn't have the power to. luckily. his well-known, uhm,
> paranoia regarding *any* kind of external control justifies the
> assumption that he would become active if he had the means to. it's
> people like him who ensured that the TWG had no chance to succeed in the
> first place (ultimately it failed for other reasons, so i don't blame
> anyone).
> 
> > He is just explaining the already existing rules to you.
> 
> oh, thanks. as if i didn't know them ...
> 
> > There is zero reason to include him in the equation for hiring a dev.
> > That you do so anyway just makes you look like you are attacking him
> > personally for disagreeing with you.
> 
> i'm attacking not him, but his POV. i'm doing that with the purpose of
> exposing his fallacy, so others don't fall for it.

Yes, i'm evil :-)

Albert

> _______________________________________________
> Kde-scm-interest mailing list
> Kde-scm-interest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest