[Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:01:44AM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Monday 15. February 2010 23.50.56 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > The thing is that i don't see consensus *at all*.
> > 
> > so? by suppressing the offer you make sure that there won't be any.
> 
> Calm down,
>
i'm pretty much always calm. ;)

> Albert is not suppressing anything.
>
no - he doesn't have the power to. luckily. his well-known, uhm,
paranoia regarding *any* kind of external control justifies the
assumption that he would become active if he had the means to. it's
people like him who ensured that the TWG had no chance to succeed in the
first place (ultimately it failed for other reasons, so i don't blame
anyone).

> He is just explaining the already existing rules to you.
>
oh, thanks. as if i didn't know them ...

> There is zero reason to include him in the equation for hiring a dev.
> That you do so anyway just makes you look like you are attacking him
> personally for disagreeing with you.
> 
i'm attacking not him, but his POV. i'm doing that with the purpose of
exposing his fallacy, so others don't fall for it.