[Kde-scm-interest] scripty questions

[Albert Astals Cid]

A Dilluns, 25 de maig de 2009, Ian Monroe va escriure:
> 2009/5/24 Chani <chanika at gmail.com>:
> >> 2) have scripty copy the doc folder from each git-module into
> >> documentation/ and commit it to svn (chusslove's idea).
> >> pro: translators don't have to lift a finger, and still no pain for
> >> packagers or developers
> >> con: ugly. wastes disk space and svn revisions.
> >
> > I talked with some translators on irc and decided to go with this option
> > for now. that means no changes to workflow at all for the translators.
> >
> > it does make sense for the period where only amarok will be in git,
> > actually, since we haven't yet *proved* git's going to work out, and I'm
> > not sure how long it'll be before amarok's out of the guinea-pig phase :)
>
> And Amarok is in extragear, so the doc folder is already separate from
> the folder that will be "gitified" anyways.

You really plan moving amarok code to git and leave amarok documentation in a 
different server? Doesn't seem too sensible thing to do for me.

Albert

>
> I also think that as a general rule we should be conservative in
> making changes, since its hard to test anything at this point. We can
> do the changes one-by-one before switching the whole of KDE.
>
> Ian
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-scm-interest mailing list
> Kde-scm-interest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest