[Kde-scm-interest] scripty questions

[Ian Monroe]

2009/5/24 Chani <chanika at gmail.com>:
>
>> 2) have scripty copy the doc folder from each git-module into
>> documentation/ and commit it to svn (chusslove's idea).
>> pro: translators don't have to lift a finger, and still no pain for
>> packagers or developers
>> con: ugly. wastes disk space and svn revisions.
>
> I talked with some translators on irc and decided to go with this option for
> now. that means no changes to workflow at all for the translators.
>
> it does make sense for the period where only amarok will be in git, actually,
> since we haven't yet *proved* git's going to work out, and I'm not sure how
> long it'll be before amarok's out of the guinea-pig phase :)

And Amarok is in extragear, so the doc folder is already separate from
the folder that will be "gitified" anyways.

I also think that as a general rule we should be conservative in
making changes, since its hard to test anything at this point. We can
do the changes one-by-one before switching the whole of KDE.

Ian