[Kde-scm-interest] Amarok move to git broke scripty

[Chani]

On July 28, 2009 00:04:54 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> >A Dilluns, 27 de juliol de 2009, Chani va escriure:
> >> > > I don't expect it to happen often at all, but it'd be nice if it
> >> > > didn't take down translations for the whole branch if it does.
> >> >
> >> > Why it should take them down? If updating fails it will work over
> >> > old files but i don't see why it would take down translations at
> >> > all.
> >> >
> >> > I mean, svn has the exact same problem, no? If svn up fails,
> >> > findfiles works over old files, right?
> >>
> >> not with git, because the way I wrote it those "old files" may
> >> actually be a different branch. so it aborts to avoid doing weird
> >> things.
> >>
> >> the lazy way out would be to just use some extra disk space and have
> >> separate workdirs for separate branches (I've never done that before,
> >> though, so thiago would have to explain how it works).
> >
> >That would be the easy way and that's what we do for svn so disk space
> > is not really a problem.
>
> If disk space is not a problem, just clone again.

ok, so then I'd want the branch, when it does git, to just use a different set 
of folders... easy peasy :)
does anyone actually care what I name them? I'm thinking git-unstable/ and 
git-stable/ (which would map to trunk and branch).

-- 
This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3.
www.chani3.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20090728/4f84be31/attachment.sig