[Kde-scm-interest] Amarok move to git broke scripty

Albert Astals Cid aacid at kde.org
Mon Jul 27 20:03:48 CEST 2009


A Dilluns, 27 de juliol de 2009, Chani va escriure:
> On July 27, 2009 10:51:39 Chani wrote:
> > > > I don't expect it to happen often at all, but it'd be nice if it
> > > > didn't take down translations for the whole branch if it does.
> > >
> > > Why it should take them down? If updating fails it will work over old
> > > files but i don't see why it would take down translations at all.
> > >
> > > I mean, svn has the exact same problem, no? If svn up fails, findfiles
> > > works over old files, right?
> >
> > not with git, because the way I wrote it those "old files" may actually
> > be a different branch. so it aborts to avoid doing weird things.
> >
> > the lazy way out would be to just use some extra disk space and have
> > separate workdirs for separate branches (I've never done that before,
> > though, so thiago would have to explain how it works).
>
> of course, this is all theoretical right now because git support is only in
> the one branch, but I didn't want that to be forgotten and cause trouble
> later on.
>
> also, if findfiles is changed, we can do the modules fully one by one,
> reducing the chances of not being able to commit back the desktop files
> (because there's less time in which people might make a conflicting
> commit).

Well, people don't commit to .desktop files much so i really doubt this is a 
problem.

Albert


More information about the Kde-scm-interest mailing list