[Kde-scm-interest] meeting summary

[Lydia Pintscher]

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 00:57, Jeff Mitchell <mitchell at kde.org> wrote:
>> Well yes. That is exactly my point. We only want +kde-developers to
>> commit to "our" code and we want them to have access to all of it, not
>> only a part.
>> With a lot of those small project groups we give the opportunity to
>> give only a small group commit access to a certain part of our code.
>
> I think you're misunderstanding.
>
> The purpose of the small project groups is *only* for review
> capabilities -- i.e. merge requests. So essentially, you join the groups
> to opt-in to the merge request for that group's repositories (and have
> the ability to change the status of the merge requests). That's *all*.
>
> All repositories will have commit access by, and *only* by +kde-developers.
>
> And all repositories will have admin access by, and *only* by,
> +kde-sysadmin. (Should it be renamed +kde-sysadmins? Dunno.)

Ok jep. That sounds good and was what I understood. It's more about
what those will be used for in the future. Let's rename the group to
-reviewers then to make it clearer what it is about and discouraging
people from "abusing" it?


Cheers
Lydia

-- 
Lydia Pintscher
Amarok community manager
kde.org - amarok.kde.org - kubuntu.org
claimid.com/nightrose