[Kde-scm-interest] meeting summary

[Jeff Mitchell]

On 12/9/2009 6:48 PM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 00:36, Oswald Buddenhagen <ossi at kde.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:14:17AM +0100, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
>>> Once all of KDE is on gitorious it will be extremely hard to maintain
>>> the policy of only having these $-developer groups for merge requests
>>> and nothing else. And the more of those groups we create with every
>>> project that moves the bigger the incentive will be to not use
>>> +kde-developers but the smaller group for commit rights.
>>>
>> why do you bring +kde-developers in? it is *exactly* the equivalent of
>> having an svn account.
> 
> Well yes. That is exactly my point. We only want +kde-developers to
> commit to "our" code and we want them to have access to all of it, not
> only a part.
> With a lot of those small project groups we give the opportunity to
> give only a small group commit access to a certain part of our code.

I think you're misunderstanding.

The purpose of the small project groups is *only* for review
capabilities -- i.e. merge requests. So essentially, you join the groups
to opt-in to the merge request for that group's repositories (and have
the ability to change the status of the merge requests). That's *all*.

All repositories will have commit access by, and *only* by +kde-developers.

And all repositories will have admin access by, and *only* by,
+kde-sysadmin. (Should it be renamed +kde-sysadmins? Dunno.)

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20091209/98518075/attachment.sig