-quality moderation

[Philip Rodrigues]

> Doing that would re-focus this mailing list as a quality *assurance* list,
> or quality *checking* and away from newcomers and away from being a dumping
> ground for things-that-might-improve-kde. The latter two are better served
> elsewhere (howtohelp@, kde-usability@ or applications specific lists). Then
> the focus of this list would become:
>
> - KDE quality assurance
>   - coordination of bug triage
>   - bug dispute resolution
>   - coding guidelines and standards
>   - code checking
>   - verification of KDE code
>   - research into KDE quality

As someone who's been on this list nearly from the time it was started, I have 
to say that I agree with Adriaan. While I still like the idea of the quality 
team as originally proposed by Carlos, I think that the naming and history of 
this list mean that it's not the best place to continue those efforts.

Regards,
Philip
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-quality/attachments/20070122/4efc2dfc/attachment.pgp