Helping with Documentation

[Carlos Leonhard Woelz]

On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:22:39 +0000, "Philip Rodrigues"
<philip.rodrigues at christ-church.oxford.ac.uk> said:
> We usually work from a recent HEAD (unstable) build, or a recent beta.
> There 
> are a few things for which you won't need that: For KOffice, you can work 
> from the 1.3 release, since the documentation is quite out-of-date. There
> are 
> probably other things, too.

This issues are covered here, including the choice of what to build:

http://quality.kde.org/develop/cvsguide/

I don't believe there is another guide that covers the subject so
extensively. I guess this list is a good place to ask for information, if
you face any problems.


>If you would like to help, but running CVS HEAD 
>is a problem, email this list or kde-doc-english at kde.org, and we'll try to 
>find something suitable.

Indeed, there are some very stable applications with old docs. For these,
an update in the docs based on KDE 3.2 instead of KDE HEAD brings very
little disadvantages. A list of such applications could be useful. I know
that KNode and KNotes can be considered to be in this category.

Cheers,
-- 
  Carlos Leonhard Woelz
  carloswoelz at imap-mail.com

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...